SEGUNDO O GREENPEACE EM RELATÓRIO DE 10/01
Por ordem decrescente
7.3
Nokia -- Remains in first place with good scores on toxics use reduction, but loses points on energy.
6.9
Sony Ericsson -- Moves up with top marks on toxics elimination but weak on recycling.
5.3
Toshiba -- Good score on toxics elimination but needs to meet upcoming phase out commitment by March 2010. ...
5.3
Philips -- Loses points for failing to lobby for phase out of hazardous substance in legislation.
5.1
Apple -- Continues to improve, scoring best on eliminating toxic chemicals and e-waste criteria.
5.1
LG Electronics -- LG score improves, but is still penalized for postponing date for toxics phase out.
5.1
Sony -- Maintains overall score with better energy total, but needs to lobby for stronger chemicals
legislation.
5.1
Motorola -- Slightly reduced score, due to lack of lobbying for stronger chemicals legislation.
5.1
Samsung -- Big drop due to penalty point for failing to meet commitment to phase out hazardous substances.
4.9
Panasonic -- Score unchanged, strongest on energy but poor on e-waste and recycling.
4.7
HP Improved position thanks to clear support for global emissions reductions, but needs to lobby for improved chemical legislation.More...
4.5
Acer -- Score unchanged but Acer is lobbying for stronger chemicals legislation.
4.5
Sharp -- Loses points due to poor information on toxics elimination and fails to support stronger chemicals legislation.
3.9
Dell -- Reduced score on energy criteria and penalty point for delaying toxics phase out till 2011.
3.5
Fujitsu -- Improved score due to support for global carbon emission reductions and cutting its own emissions.
2.5
Lenovo -- Score unchanged, with penalty point for indefinite delay on toxics phase out.
2.4
Microsoft -- Reduced score, fails to support strong chemicals legislation.
1.4
Nintendo -- Nintendo remains in last place with the same score.
